Experiment and Quantification of Weight: Late-Renaissance and Early Modern Medical, Mineralogical and Chemical Discussions on the Weights of Metals

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en: Early Science and Medicine. Vol. 25 No. 4 (2020) 25. Paises Bajos : Brill, 2020
Autor Principal: Manzo, Silvia
Formato: Artículo
Temas:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.15826/pr.15826.pdf
https://brill.com/view/journals/esm/25/4/article-p388_5.xml
https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/144304
Resumen:This paper explores how a set of observations on the weight of lead were interpreted and assessed between the 1540s and the 1630s across three different interconnecting disciplines: medicine, mineralogy and chemistry. The epistemic import of these discussions will be demonstrated by showing: 1) the changing role and articulation of experience and quantification in the investigation of metals; and 2) the notions associated with weight in different disciplinary frameworks. In medicine and mineralogy, weight was not considered as a specific subject of inquiry in itself, but as a "sign" indicating other relevant properties of metals. In contrast, the chemistry tradition was increasingly concerned with the specific investigation of weight as a property of matter, as seen in the debates that took place in the "chemical revolution." In addition, this study will reveal the versatility, polysemy, and parallel purposes of the recourse to experiential knowledge in different contexts, where the same "facts" operate within different disciplines.
ISSN:ISSN 1573-3823

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
001 ARTI15722
008 230422s2020####|||#####|#########0#####d
100 |a Manzo, Silvia 
245 1 0 |a Experiment and Quantification of Weight: Late-Renaissance and Early Modern Medical, Mineralogical and Chemical Discussions on the Weights of Metals 
041 7 |2 ISO 639-1  |a en 
520 3 |a This paper explores how a set of observations on the weight of lead were interpreted and assessed between the 1540s and the 1630s across three different interconnecting disciplines: medicine, mineralogy and chemistry. The epistemic import of these discussions will be demonstrated by showing: 1) the changing role and articulation of experience and quantification in the investigation of metals; and 2) the notions associated with weight in different disciplinary frameworks. In medicine and mineralogy, weight was not considered as a specific subject of inquiry in itself, but as a "sign" indicating other relevant properties of metals. In contrast, the chemistry tradition was increasingly concerned with the specific investigation of weight as a property of matter, as seen in the debates that took place in the "chemical revolution." In addition, this study will reveal the versatility, polysemy, and parallel purposes of the recourse to experiential knowledge in different contexts, where the same "facts" operate within different disciplines. 
653 |a Weight 
653 |a Lead 
653 |a Quantification 
653 |a Experiments 
653 |a Calcination of metals 
653 |a Conservation of mass 
653 |a Galen 
653 |a Georg Agricola 
653 |a Vannoccio Biringuccio 
653 |a Julius Caesar Scaliger 
653 |a Girolamo Cardano 
653 |a Gabriele Falloppio 
653 |a Andrea Cesalpino 
653 |a Girolamo Mercuriale 
653 |a Peter Monau, Giovanni Battista Cortesi 
653 |a Johann Gerhard 
653 |a Jean Rey 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.15826/pr.15826.pdf 
952 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.15826/pr.15826.pdf  |a MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA 
856 4 1 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/esm/25/4/article-p388_5.xml 
856 4 1 |u https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/144304 
773 0 |7 nnas  |t Early Science and Medicine.   |g Vol. 25 No. 4 (2020)  |v 25  |l 4  |d Paises Bajos : Brill, 2020  |x ISSN 1573-3823 
542 1 |f Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/