Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio : ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en: Euphrosyne. No. 45 (2017),259-270. Lisboa : Centro de Estudos Clássicos, 2017
Autor Principal: Martínez Astorino, Pablo
Formato: Artículo
Temas:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13259/pr.13259.pdf
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/103408
https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/52292
Resumen:The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar's political life: the rejection of the royal emblems fi rst from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79.2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a refl ection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a signifi cant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.
Descripción Física:p.259-270
ISSN:ISSN 0870-0133

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
001 ARTI13250
008 230422s2017####|||#####|#########0#####d
100 |a Martínez Astorino, Pablo  |u UNLP-Conicet 
245 1 0 |a Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio  |b : ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía? 
041 7 |2 ISO 639-1  |a es 
300 |a  p.259-270 
520 3 |a The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar's political life: the rejection of the royal emblems fi rst from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79.2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a refl ection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a signifi cant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus. 
653 |a Cipus-Caesar 
653 |a Mythologization 
653 |a Monarchy 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13259/pr.13259.pdf 
952 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13259/pr.13259.pdf  |a MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA 
856 4 1 |u http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/103408 
856 4 1 |u https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/52292 
773 0 |7 nnas  |t Euphrosyne.   |g  No. 45 (2017),259-270  |l 45  |q 259-270  |d Lisboa : Centro de Estudos Clássicos, 2017  |x ISSN 0870-0133 
542 1 |f Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional  |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/